Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores nuclear structures in Milky Way-mass galaxies, indicating the role of bulges in formation dynamics.
We present the first results from the SMUGGLE-Ring project, a suite of simulations employing the Stars and MUltiphase Gas in GaLaxiEs (SMUGGLE) interstellar medium (ISM) and stellar feedback model to explore nuclear structures in Milky Way-mass galaxies. We discuss the results from three simulations evolved for 5 Gyr in isolation, in which we vary the classical bulge mass while keeping the disk and halo structures identical. Nuclear stellar disks and rings emerge exclusively in our bulge models, with more massive bulges associated with earlier formation and more extended initial gas reservoirs shortly after bar formation. After gas depletion via active star formation, the nuclear stellar disks bifurcate into pressure-supported nuclear star clusters (NSCs; v_ϕ/σ_R < 0.7) and rotationally supported nuclear stellar rings (NSRs; v_ϕ/σ_R = 1.2--1.7, radii 0.64--0.76 kpc). In our bulgeless model, stellar feedback more effectively disrupts and delays the buildup of stable nuclear gas disks. The enclosed stellar mass of NSCs (sim10^ 9 dominates over that of NSRs (sim10^ 8 The star formation rates decline over time due to gas depletion (NSCs 0.1--1 Msunyr-1, NSRs 0.01--0.1 Kinematics reveal outward-shifting rotation peaks with σ-drops in NSRs, while a fraction of stars in NSCs exhibits radial shift after 3 Gyr. These findings support inside-out NSD formation via secular bar evolution, with NSRs tracing the star-forming outer edge of the nuclear gas disk and NSCs forming the kinematically hotter inner component. The range of nuclear stellar disk sizes (0.25--0.76 kpc) falls within the observationally inferred ranges, but the existence of larger rings would require external gas flow and/or a longer period of evolution. Future SMUGGLE-Ring extensions will incorporate varying gas fractions, tidal--merger effects, and the circumgalactic medium to further investigate nuclear diversity and outliers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: