Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental evaluation of a fluidic powder switch improves responsiveness in laser material deposition processes.
In this work, a novel fluidic powder switch is developed, featuring an innovative design that enables near-instantaneous switching of a powder flow. Unlike conventional solutions, the fluid-based mechanism eliminates the need for mechanical switching elements in the powder conveying line, reducing system wear and enabling direct integration into a Laser Material Deposition (LMD or DED-LB/P) nozzle. The present work focuses on the evaluation and systematic assessment of the main functionality of toggling of a focused powder gas jet by analyzing switching times, delays caused by system inertia, and the stability and repeatability of the switching process. Measurements in a dedicated experimental setup show that a stable powder flow is consistently achieved within <200 ms, while powder deactivation occurs within <40 ms, highlighting the system's responsiveness and suitability for highly dynamic LMD and extreme high-speed laser material deposition processes. A high repeatability was demonstrated with rapid switching trials showing a standard deviation of as low as 1.74 and 24.1 ms between switching cycles for “time to powder on” and “time to stable powder flow,” respectively. In direct comparison with a commercially available mechanical powder switching system, the fluidic solution presented in this work demonstrated an improvement in responsiveness of approximately 83% under identical test conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glushych et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: