Retrospective cohort study identifies risk factors for morbidity and mortality in infants with Robin Sequence, suggesting the need for early evaluation.
ObjectiveTo assess the incidence of Robin Sequence in the United States and evaluate predictors of early morbidity and mortality.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingEpic Cosmos database.Patients, ParticipantsPatients with Robin Sequence diagnosed within the first year of life from January 2015 to December 2024.InterventionsVariables including prenatal drug exposure (PDE), prematurity, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), concomitant airway diagnoses, genetic syndromes, and anomalies of the cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, or central nervous system (CNS) were captured.Main Outcome Measure(s)Incidence across a 10-year period and associations with admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission and ED visit, and one-year mortality through a multivariate logistic regression.Results3863 patients were identified, for an incidence of 1 in 3713 live births. NICU admission was significantly associated with PDE, prematurity, IUGR, tracheomalacia, laryngomalacia, cleft palate, and presence of a cardiopulmonary or CNS anomaly. NICU LOS was associated with prematurity, bronchomalacia, and the presence of a gastrointestinal anomaly. 30-day readmission was associated with PDE, prematurity, tracheomalacia, laryngomalacia, cleft palate, cardiopulmonary anomalies, and CNS anomalies. 30-day ED visit was associated with prematurity, tracheomalacia, cleft palate, cardiopulmonary anomalies, and CNS anomalies. One-year mortality was associated with prematurity, IUGR, cardiopulmonary anomalies, and CNS anomalies.ConclusionsSignificant associations were identified between morbidity and mortality and perinatal factors, concomitant airway diagnoses, and the presence of cardiopulmonary and CNS anomalies. These findings underscore the importance of an early comprehensive evaluation for patients with Robin Sequence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lisk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: