Evaluates the impact of soil storage methods on aminopeptidase activity sensitivity in soil nitrogen assessments, indicating preservation effectiveness.
Evaluating soil storage impacts on aminopeptidase activity can inform the use of aminopeptidase activity in soil N cycling assessments. We evaluated the impact of soil refrigeration (4 °C) and air-drying relative to field-fresh (4 °C for ≤ 3 d) on the activities and sensitivity of eight amino acid-specific aminopeptidase activities across a 42 y N fertilization gradient (0–269 kg N ha − 1 ) over 1.5, 6, 12 and 24 mo storage. Soil storage generally decreased (7–95%) or did not impact aminopeptidase activities, but in some cases increased activity (7–18%). Activity decreases were greatest for glutamic acid, arginine, and lysine aminopeptidases. Proline and leucine aminopeptidase activities were least impacted by soil storage. In field-fresh soils, only arginine and lysine aminopeptidase activities differed across the N fertilization gradient: ≈50% lower at the second highest (202 kg N ha − 1 ) relative to the lowest (67 kg N ha − 1 ) positive fertilization rate, a trend preserved for up to 12 mo in refrigerated soils and up to 24 mo in air-dried soils. Aminopeptidase activities that were similar across the N fertilization gradient in field-fresh soils also remained similar in stored soils, or responded similarly to N fertilization as arginine and lysine aminopeptidase activities. Most aminopeptidase activities were similar between refrigerated and air-dried soils for at least 6 mo or up to 24 mo. Though soil storage impacts on activities were aminopeptidase-specific, both storage methods preserved the sensitivity of aminopeptidase activities to long-term field N fertilization treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attanayake et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: