Systematic review examines AI use in higher education, highlighting benefits, concerns, and implications.
This systematic review examines how higher education students use artificial intelligence (AI) across academic disciplines, including its benefits and concerns. Following PRISMA guidelines, 100 Scopus-indexed studies were analyzed. Findings show disciplinary differences in AI adoption, with Linguistics and Language-related Studies and Medical and Health Sciences reporting the highest use. Benefits include personalized feedback, increased engagement, self-regulated learning, and improved academic performance. However, concerns such as academic integrity risks, over-reliance on AI, ethical and privacy issues, uneven AI literacy, and limited pedagogical alignment persist. The review highlights the need for coherent frameworks, institutional policies, and discipline-specific AI training in higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dimitriadou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: