Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples’ perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up

Emily Koert; Gritt Marie Hviid Malling; Randi Sylvest; Maria Christine Krog; Astrid Marie Kolte; Lone Schmidt; Henriette Svarre Nielsen

doi:10.1093/humrep/dey362

November 21, 2018Human ReproductionOpen Access

Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples’ perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This study aims to understand what couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss believe they need regarding treatment, support, and follow-up.
Qualitative interviews conducted with 13 couples referred to a recurrent pregnancy loss clinic in Copenhagen.
Couples were interviewed together in a semi-structured format to gather their perspectives.
Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Couples expressed a strong desire for timely information and recognition of the psychological impact of recurrent pregnancy loss.
Both partners sought inclusion in medical consultations, emphasizing the importance of addressing their combined needs.
Participants reported feeling pressure and exhaustion by their third consecutive pregnancy loss, pointing to a significant emotional toll.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source

Implication

Qualitative interviews explore couples’ needs for treatment and psychological support in recurrent pregnancy loss, suggesting better medical approaches.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Koert et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a32ab346ba92fc1c94f884f https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey362

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples’ perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up

Key Points

No abstract yet

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples’ perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up

Key Points

No abstract yet

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading