Key result
The rRT-RAA assay demonstrated 97.4% overall agreement with a reference rRT-PCR assay for detecting Senecavirus A in clinical swine samples (kappa 0.927, p < .001).
Why the study?
Timely and dependable detection of Senecavirus A is needed to help prevent the further spread of this pathogenic virus in pigs.
Does the rRT-RAA assay accurately detect Senecavirus A in clinical swine samples compared to standard rRT-PCR?
Does the rRT-RAA assay accurately detect Senecavirus A in clinical swine samples compared to standard rRT-PCR?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The newly developed rRT-RAA assay provides a rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic tool for detecting Senecavirus A in swine, demonstrating high agreement with standard rRT-PCR.
Senecavirus A (SVA), a newly emergent picornavirus correlated with sudden neonatal mortality and vesicular lesions in pigs, has had a considerable impact on the global pig farming industry. Timely and dependable detection of SVA is helpful in preventing the further spread of this pathogenic virus. In the current study, a real-time fluorescent reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (rRT-RAA) assay, which targets the most conserved region within the VP2 gene of SVA, was developed and evaluated for SVA detection. The detection limit for this assay was tested to be 1.185 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) of SVA RNA per reaction at a 95% confidence interval, which is comparable to that of a previously published rRT-PCR assay for SVA. The testing results of the rRT-RAA assay were very reproducible and repeatable, with inter- and intra-assay coefficient of variation values less than 7.0%. In addition, the established rRT-RAA assay displayed excellent specificity for SVA detection without cross-reaction with other clinically important swine pathogenic viruses. The diagnostic performance of rRT-RAA was evaluated using 189 clinical swine samples, which were detected in parallel using the reference rRT-PCR assay. The results showed that 146 and 151 samples tested positive for SVA by rRT-RAA and rRT-PCR, respectively. The overall agreement between both assays was 97.4% (184/189) with a kappa value of 0.927 (p < .001). Further linear regression analysis demonstrated that the detection results between the two assays were significantly correlated (R2 = 0.9192, p < .0001). Taken together, our newly established rRT-RAA assay is a powerful and time-saving diagnostic tool for SVA detection in clinical samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) studied Senecavirus A (n=189). rRT-RAA assay vs. reference rRT-PCR assay was evaluated on Overall agreement between rRT-RAA and rRT-PCR assays (kappa 0.927, p=< .001). The rRT-RAA assay demonstrated 97.4% overall agreement with a reference rRT-PCR assay for detecting Senecavirus A in clinical swine samples (kappa 0.927, p < .001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: