Key result
Ischaemia-modified albumin concentrations were significantly higher in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to healthy controls (SMD 2.38; 95% CI 1.88 to 2.88; p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Identifying novel circulating biomarkers of ACS may improve diagnosis and management.
Are ischaemia-modified albumin (IMA) concentrations significantly higher in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to healthy controls?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,677)
Yes
Are ischaemia-modified albumin (IMA) concentrations significantly higher in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to healthy controls?
Standardized Mean Difference: 2.38 (95% CI 1.88–2.88)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Ischaemia-modified albumin concentrations are significantly elevated in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to healthy controls, suggesting potential utility as a diagnostic biomarker.
Elevated IMA supports ACS biomarker research; leaves open diagnostic utility without prospective validation.
The identification of novel circulating biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may improve diagnosis and management. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of ischaemia-modified albumin (IMA), an emerging biomarker of ischaemia and oxidative stress, in ACS. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to March 2022, and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of evidence with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and GRADE, respectively. In 18 studies (1654 ACS patients and 1023 healthy controls), IMA concentrations were significantly higher in ACS (standard mean difference, SMD = 2.38, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.88; p < 0.001; low certainty of evidence). The effect size was not associated with pre-defined study or patient characteristics, barring the country where the study was conducted. There were no significant differences in effect size between acute myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina (UA), and between ST-elevation (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI). However, the effect size was progressively larger in UA (SMD = 1.63), NSTEMI (SMD = 1.91), and STEMI (3.26). Our meta-analysis suggests that IMA might be useful to diagnose ACS. Further studies are warranted to compare the diagnostic performance of IMA vs. established markers, e.g., troponin, and to determine its potential utility in discriminating between UA, NSTEMI, and STEMI (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021324603).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangoni et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute coronary syndrome (n=2,677). Ischaemia-modified albumin (IMA) vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on IMA concentrations (SMD 2.38, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.88, p=< 0.001). Ischaemia-modified albumin concentrations were significantly higher in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to healthy controls (SMD 2.38; 95% CI 1.88 to 2.88; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: