Key result
Ischemia-modified albumin > 80 U/mL was a poor predictor of serious short-term cardiac outcomes in patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (LR 0.98; 95% CI 0.86-1.11).
Why the study?
Does ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) measurement predict short-term serious cardiac outcomes in patients presenting with potential acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=189)
Does ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) measurement predict short-term serious cardiac outcomes in patients presenting with potential acute coronary syndrome?
Effect estimate: LR 0.98 (95% CI 0.86-1.11)
Ischemia-modified albumin is a poor predictor of short-term serious cardiac outcomes in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.
Does not support IMA use for short-term ACS risk stratification; observational data leave open refined thresholds or combinations.
BACKGROUND: Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) has been suggested as a marker of cardiac ischemia. Little, however, is known about its capacity to predict short-term serious cardiac outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, serious arrhythmia, or refractory ischemic cardiac pain) in patients arriving at the emergency department with symptoms that may indicate cardiac ischemia. METHODS: We screened 546 patients over a 4-week period, of whom 189 fulfilled our entry criteria by presenting to an emergency department with potential cardiac-ischemia symptoms within 6 hours after chest pain, seeing an emergency physician who chose to order a troponin I test, and having no serious cardiac outcome before the troponin result became available. We followed the study patients for 72 hours to determine if any experienced a serious cardiac outcome. We calculated the likelihood ratios (LRs) of IMA findings predicting serious cardiac outcomes that could not be diagnosed at presentation with current techniques. RESULTS: Of the 189 patients, 24 had a serious cardiac outcome within 72 hours after their arrival at the emergency department. The likelihood ratios for IMA measurement within 6 hours after chest pain predicting a serious cardiac outcome within the next 72 hours were 1.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.315-5.79) for IMA < or = 80 U/mL and 0.98 (95% CI 0.86- 1.11) for IMA > 80 U/mL. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in patients presenting with chest pain who have not yet experienced a serious cardiac event, IMA is a poor predictor of serious cardiac outcomes in the short term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Worster (2005) conducted a cohort in potential acute coronary syndrome (n=189). Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) > 80 U/mL vs. IMA ≤ 80 U/mL was evaluated on Serious cardiac outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, serious arrhythmia, or refractory ischemic cardiac pain) within 72 hours (LR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.11). Ischemia-modified albumin > 80 U/mL was a poor predictor of serious short-term cardiac outcomes in patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (LR 0.98; 95% CI 0.86-1.11).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: