Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Several recent empirical tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model have been based on the conditional relationship between betas and market returns. This paper shows that this method needs reconsideration. An adjusted version of this test is presented. It is then demonstrated that the adjusted technique has similar, or lower, power to the more easily implemented CAPM test of Fama and MacBeth (1973) if returns are normally distributed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freeman et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: