Key result
Warfarin shows no benefit over no treatment for stroke or TIA in hyperthyroidism-related AF.
Why the study?
The use of oral anticoagulants for patients with new-onset hyperthyroidism-related AF is controversial.
Does warfarin use reduce the risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in patients with hyperthyroidism-related atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=258)
Yes
Does warfarin use reduce the risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in patients with hyperthyroidism-related atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 1.16 (95% CI 0.52–2.56)
Absolute Event Rate: 21.1% vs 12.5%
p-value: p=0.717
In patients with new-onset hyperthyroidism-related atrial fibrillation and a low CHA2DS2-VASc score, warfarin did not significantly reduce ischemic stroke or TIA risk, suggesting anticoagulation initiation should rely primarily on standard risk scoring rather than hyperthyroid status alone.
Warfarin not associated with lower stroke risk in hyperthyroidism-related AF; leaves open whether hyperthyroid status should modify standard CHA2DS2-VASc-guided decisions.
The use of oral anticoagulants for patients with new-onset hyperthyroidism-related atrial fibrillation (AF) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of warfarin therapy in this population. This retrospective cohort study used a data-cut of Taiwan Health and Welfare Database between 2000 and 2016. We compared warfarin users and nonusers among AF patients with hyperthyroidism. We used 1:2 propensity score matching to balance covariates and Cox regression model to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was risk of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and the secondary outcome was major bleeding. After propensity score matching, we defined 90 and 168 hyperthyroidism-related AF patients with mean (SD) age of 59.9 ± 13.5 and 59.2 ± 14.6 in the warfarin-treated group and untreated group separately. The mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc scores for the two groups were 2.1 ± 1.6 and 1.8 ± 1.5, respectively. Patients with hyperthyroidism-related AF receiving warfarin had no significant risk of ischemic stroke/TIA (adjusted HR: 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52–2.56, p = 0.717) compared to nonusers. There was a comparable risk of major bleeding between those receiving warfarin or not (adjusted HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.56–1.47, p = 0.702). The active-comparator design also demonstrated that warfarin use had no significant association with the risk of stroke/TIA versus aspirin use (adjusted HR: 2.43; 95% CI: 0.68–8.70). In conclusion, anticoagulation therapy did not have a statistically significant benefit on ischemic stroke/TIA nor risk of bleeding, among patients with new-onset hyperthyroidism-related AF under a low CHA2DS2-VASc score, by comparing those without use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Hyperthyroidism-related atrial fibrillation (n=258). Warfarin vs. No warfarin treatment was evaluated on Composite of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.52-2.56, p=0.717). Warfarin use was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke or TIA compared to no treatment (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.52-2.56, p=0.717) in patients with hyperthyroidism-related atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: