Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how CO2 carbonation improves mechanical strength of hydrophobic backfill materials, indicating potential for enhanced material durability.
This study investigates the effects of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) treatment and CO 2 carbonation on the wettability, mechanical properties, pore structure, and CO 2 adsorption behavior of hydrophobic backfill (HBF) materials. The results indicate that PDMS significantly enhances hydrophobicity, with the contact angle exceeding 90° at 2.88% PDMS and reaching a peak of 136.5°. However, excessive PDMS (>2.88%) inhibited alkali activation, leading to microstructural loosening and reduced compressive strength. CO 2 carbonation effectively counteracted this strength loss, filling voids and densifying the matrix, resulting in up to a 43.5% strength increase at 8.64% PDMS. The CO 2 adsorption process followed a Langmuir-like model, with rapid adsorption in the initial phase, followed by saturation. CO 2 uptake increased from 42.3 mg/g (untreated) to 60.5 mg/g (8.64% PDMS-treated), attributed to the indirect role of PDMS in creating additional CO 2 interaction sites. Pore structure analysis revealed that PDMS initially reduced porosity but promoted pore coarsening at higher concentrations, while CO 2 carbonation refined the pore network, decreasing total porosity and threshold diameters. Micromorphological and elemental analyses confirmed the formation of carbonation products, which reinforced the hydrated gel structure. The results demonstrate a compensatory mechanism where CO 2 carbonation remediates the strength loss typically caused by hydrophobic modification, resulting in a material that maintains high mechanical integrity while achieving superior water resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: