Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review highlights advances in pharmacological strategies for intestinal failure in adults, suggesting improved outcomes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Short bowel syndrome intestinal failure (SBS-IF) occupies a unique position at the interface between chronic organ failure management and intestinal transplantation (iTx). Historically, patients with SBF-IF progressed inevitably toward lifelong home parenteral support (HPS) dependence and, in a small and highly selected subset with impending HPS failure, ultimately to iTx. Recent advances in pro-adaptive pharmacological strategies, focusing on glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-2 and GLP-1-based approaches as adjuncts to conventional antimotility and antisecretory therapies, are reviewed, with implications for decision-making across the SBS-IF disease trajectory presented. RECENT FINDINGS: SBS-IF is now recognized as a dynamic and modifiable form of organ failure. Targeted pro-adaptive interventions reduce HPS dependence and improve patient-centered outcomes. Conventional antimotility and antisecretory therapies remain foundational, whereas GLP-2 analogues are the first pathophysiology-targeted, pro-adaptive therapies in SBS-IF, while GLP-1 receptor agonists have emerged as promising adjuncts in selected patients, particularly those with high-output phenotypes. SUMMARY: Multidisciplinary intestinal failure rehabilitation and gut-directed pharmacotherapy have altered the natural history of SBS-IF. Medical rehabilitation has shifted iTx from a default end-stage therapy to a targeted rescue option reserved for irreversible HPS failure, to be considered after optimized rehabilitation but before the transplant window is lost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palle Bekker Jeppesen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: