Longitudinal study examines the roles of sex and gender on psychological distress during COVID-19, highlighting gender's impact.
BackgroundHealthcare workers faced immense challenges during the early COVID-19 pandemic, contributing to their psychological distress. Female workers have been shown to be at higher risk, but most studies only measured birth-assigned sex, thereby overlooking sociocultural (gender) differences.ObjectiveTo examine the respective roles of sex and gender in the association between COVID-19-related occupational stressors and psychological distress among healthcare workers over time during the early phase of the pandemic.MethodsThis longitudinal study examined 382 Canadian healthcare workers (12.8% male, 87.2% female; 92.9% white) monitored weekly over 8 weeks during the first two waves of the pandemic. Using sociodemographic and work data, we developed a composite gender index and investigated how sex, gender, and COVID-19-related stressors related to psychological distress (anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress) using linear mixed models.ResultsCOVID-19-related stressors were associated with higher distress. A more feminine gender score, but not female sex, predicted higher distress. A modest interaction was observed based on a small subgroup, suggesting lower anxiety and posttraumatic stress among medically vulnerable workers with higher feminine gender scores. Overall distress decreased modestly over time, although models explained a limited proportion of variance.ConclusionThese findings underscore the need to go beyond birth-assigned sex in mental health assessments of healthcare workers during public health crises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dufour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: