Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines how leadership language reshapes the understanding of community music facilitation, indicating its significance as a public health resource.
Community music practitioners are commonly described as ‘facilitators’ when working in the interventionist mode, yet this terminology may inadvertently limit our understanding of this sophisticated role and its transformative impacts. Drawing on cognitive linguistics, this article examines how language shapes our conceptualization of community music practice. Etymological and linguistic analysis shows that ‘facilitation’ invokes the conceptual metaphor of craft work, emphasizing the musicians’ tools and techniques, while ‘leadership’ suggests journey-based conceptual structures of pathfinding, direction and transformation. This examination is followed by an exploration of two contemporary leadership theories – positively energizing leadership from positive organizational scholarship and identity leadership from social psychology – which offer comprehensive frameworks for understanding the complex, multifaceted role of community musicians working in the interventionist context. Examples of practice drawn from the author’s leadership of a singing group for people with Parkinson’s and from interviews with music leaders demonstrate these leadership approaches in action. The reconceptualization of ‘facilitation’ as ‘leadership’ provides theoretically grounded language to describe, understand and value the social potential of community music making as an essential public health resource.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melissa Forbes (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: