Multi-center prospective observational study reveals high visual acuity outcomes in patients with Light Adjustable Lens bilaterally implanted, suggesting effective precision regardless of prior...
Purpose: To report the outcomes of the Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) collected from a clinical registry. Setting: Multiple private practices in the United States. Design: Multi-center prospective observational study. Methods: Patients who underwent bilateral LAL implantation and who had best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) ≥ 20/20 -2 before lens adjustment were enrolled. Assessment was performed at one visit 1-3 months after final lock-in treatment. Results: A total of 1101 participants (2202 eyes) were included. Of these, 586 eyes had prior corneal refractive surgery (CRS) and 1616 had no prior CRS (No CRS). 12.3% of participants were targeted for bilateral emmetropia, 9.3% for bilateral near and 78.4% for blended vision. Of eyes targeted for emmetropia, 81.2% achieved a UDVA of >20/20 (82.2% of No CRS and 78.4% of CRS). A total of 94.3% of eyes targeted for emmetropia had a MSE of <0.5D (94.7% of No CRS, 92.8% of CRS). The mean prediction error in MSE was -0.048 ± 0.366D in No CRS and -0.016 ± 0.441D in CRS. A total of 89% of patients with blended vision and 93% of patients with bilateral emmetropic target had binocular UCVA of >20/20. In the CRS, group 87% with blended vision and 87% with binocular emmetropia achieved binocular UCVA of >20/20. Binocular UNVA of >J1 was achieved with blended vision in 85% of patients in the No CRS group and 82% of patients in the CRS group. Conclusions: In this multi-center study, patients achieved a high degree of precision with the LAL regardless of prior corneal refractive surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schallhorn et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: