Evaluates carbon sequestration in open and closed karst reservoirs, indicating the importance of closed systems for carbon sinks.
Reservoirs in karst regions exhibit significant carbon sink potential; however, how different reservoir types influence carbon sequestration remains poorly understood. In this study, dual carbon isotopes (δ13C–Δ14C) were applied to trace dissolved organic carbon (DOC) sources in an open reservoir (Aha Reservoir, AHR) and a closed reservoir (Guanshan Lake, GSL) in southwestern China, and to evaluate their carbon sequestration potential. DOC concentrations in GSL were significantly higher than those in AHR (4.14 ± 0.28 mg/L > 3.37 ± 0.30 mg/L) (p < 0.01), along with lower δ13C values (−30.34 ± 0.51‰ < −28.18 ± 0.31‰) and more enriched Δ14C values (−6.94 ± 11.07‰ > −93.74 ± 6.76‰). The δ13C–Δ14C tracing revealed that plants were the primary DOC source for AHR (61 ± 2%), whereas algae dominated DOC sources in GSL (70 ± 2%). Inflow rivers and water retention time (WRT) likely drive differences in DOC sources and concentrations between the two reservoirs. The absence of inflow rivers and the longer WRT in GSL created favorable conditions for algal growth, resulting in substantially higher chlorophyll a (Chl.a) concentrations (103.00 ± 29.87 μg/L > 13.10 ± 3.29 μg/L) and enhanced production of autochthonous DOC through a stronger biological carbon pump (BCP) effect. These conditions further facilitate the formation and accumulation of recalcitrant DOC (RDOC), ultimately increasing DOC concentrations in GSL. Our findings highlight that closed karst reservoirs may represent important yet underappreciated carbon sinks and should receive greater attention in future carbon-sink assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: