Uncovers the structure of conditional intentions in decision-making, highlighting its implications for fairness.
When faced with a hard decision, we can and sometimes should decide decision-making away, for instance by flipping a coin. At first, this strategy might look suspect: it seems that conforming with the verdict of a coin flip and φ-ing as a result involves making the decision to φ. To address this worry, we inquire into the psychological structures that make deciding decision-making away possible. Our main contention is that it involves conditional intentions: you form the intention to φ if the coin lands heads and ψ otherwise. We then rely on the nature of the conditional intentions involved to argue that we do not make the decision to φ when the coin flip tells us to φ. We conclude by exploring the normative status of deciding decision-making away. Not only is it often permissible, whether the choice situation is mundane or life-defining, deciding decision-making away may sometimes be required, for example, to promote equality in shared agency or fairness in distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rachar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: