Investigates modified biochar's effect on energy storage in phase change materials, suggesting improved performance.
Phase change materials (PCMs) have attracted significant attention for thermal energy storage, but the development of shape-stabilized organic composite PCMs with suitable leakage resistance and thermal performance remains challenging. In this study, wheat straw was used as the precursor and pretreated with KH-570 before carbonization at four different temperatures to prepare modified biochar supports. The effects of KH-570 modification and carbonization temperature on the pore structure of wheat-straw-derived biochar and the thermal performance of three representative organic PCMs, namely paraffin, stearic acid, and polyethylene glycol, were systematically investigated. The results showed that KH-570 modification improved the pore characteristics of wheat-straw biochar. The sample carbonized at 550 °C exhibited the highest specific surface area of 38.4 m 2 /g, representing a 9.4% increase compared with the corresponding unmodified sample. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption analysis revealed hysteresis behavior, and the average pore diameter of the modified samples increased by 19.00–30.49% compared with the unmodified samples. The melting and crystallization enthalpies of the composite PCMs increased by 5.64–7.99% after modification, with the paraffin-based system showing the most notable improvement. Thermogravimetric analysis showed lower mass-loss rates and higher residual masses for the modified composites, with residual mass increases of 14.11%, 27.29%, and 23.15% for the paraffin-, stearic acid-, and polyethylene glycol-based composites, respectively, indicating improved thermal stability under the tested conditions. Overall, under the present experimental conditions, KH-570 pretreatment was associated with incremental improvements in pore accessibility, support-PCM compatibility, and latent-heat utilization of wheat-straw-biochar-supported shape-stabilized composite PCMs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: