Key result
Early evolocumab reduces complex coronary revascularization ~24% vs. delayed treatment through 8 years.
Why the study?
Does early versus delayed evolocumab treatment reduce complex coronary revascularization in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
RCT (n=27,564)
Open-label
randomized
Yes
Does early versus delayed evolocumab treatment reduce complex coronary revascularization in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early and sustained treatment with evolocumab significantly reduces the need for complex coronary revascularization compared to delayed initiation.
BACKGROUND: In FOURIER, the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab (Evo) significantly reduced the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events and coronary revascularization. AIMS: To investigate the effect of evolocumab on the incidence of complex coronary revascularization during long-term follow-up. METHODS: In FOURIER, patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with LDL-C ≥70mg/dL despite optimized statin therapy were randomized to evolocumab or placebo. At the end of the trial, patients had the option to be treated with evolocumab in the open label extension (OLE) at participating sites. All cases of coronary revascularization were centrally reviewed, and complex revascularization was defined as coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the GLOBAL LEADERS definition. Event rates through 8 years were compared between patients randomized in the parent trial to evolocumab or placebo. RESULTS: Of 27,564 patients in FOURIER, 6,635 patients (median achieved LDL-C 30 mg/dL) continued in OLE (total median follow-up 7.2 years). Patients initially randomized to evolocumab were treated on average 2.2 years earlier than patients starting treatment during OLE. In patients receiving evolocumab earlier, the rate for complex coronary revascularization through 8 years was reduced by 24% (HR 0.76 [0.67, 0.87], p<0.001). This effect was consistent for both CABG (HR 0.77 [0.66, 0.94], p=0.01) and complex PCI (HR 0.78 [0.65, 0.93], p=0.006) individually. Early versus delayed evolocumab therapy resulted in lower total stent length implanted (22,521 mm vs 28,946 mm, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with delayed treatment initiation, early and sustained treatment with evolocumab significantly reduced the likelihood of complex revascularization during long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haller et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (n=27,564). Early evolocumab treatment vs. Delayed evolocumab treatment (initial placebo) was evaluated on Complex coronary revascularization (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.87, p=<0.001). Early treatment with evolocumab significantly reduced the rate of complex coronary revascularization through 8 years compared to delayed treatment (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.87; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: