Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved tool wear classification in milling, suggesting enhanced process control.
Tool wear directly affects surface quality, dimensional accuracy, and manufacturing cost in milling operations, making reliable wear state classification essential for process control. This paper presents an offline deep learning framework for multiclass tool wear classification using the UC Berkeley milling dataset (NASA-Ames). Statistical features are extracted from vibration, acoustic emission, and spindle motor current signals, and dimensionality is reduced from 78 to 9 informative variables using LASSO regression. A four-layer Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network then models the temporal evolution of tool degradation across three wear states: healthy, degraded, and failed. Two model variants are compared: Model A uses sensor-derived features only, while Model B additionally incorporates feed rate and depth of cut as inputs. To prevent data leakage, partitioning is performed at the machining-case level rather than at the individual window level. Model A achieves 92% classification accuracy; Model B reaches 95%, demonstrating that cutting conditions provide contextual information that resolves ambiguity between wear states produced under different machining regimes. These results confirm that combining multisensor feature fusion, LASSO-based selection, and sequential deep learning constitutes an effective framework for tool wear classification in milling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bienvenu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: