Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how different asynchronies affect perceived timing in musical sounds, suggesting new insights into music perception.
When a sound occurs (i.e., its acoustic onset) is not the same as when we perceive that sound to occur. The latter location is known as the "P-center" in both music and language perception, and can be a few to over a hundred milliseconds after a sound's acoustic onset. While P-center perception in music has received scrutiny, it remains unclear how P-centers emerge when multiple instruments play together, particularly when they are not perfectly synchronized. Here, we investigate the effect of different degrees of instrument asynchrony on the P-center of their combined sound. In two experiments, participants aligned a click probe to pairs of instruments used in popular music with varying asynchronies (0-±80 ms). Results show that increasing asynchrony shifts the P-center of the compound sound later in time. Moreover, fast-attack instruments (e.g., kick drum) exert a strong pull on the P-center; fast-slow pairs largely retained a single P-center anchored to the fast-attack sound. By contrast, pairs of fast-attack sounds with ≥40 ms asynchronies between their individual P-centers provided evidence of perceptual segregation of the sound into two events. The findings show how inter-instrument asynchronies and attack characteristics jointly structure the perceived timing and unity of compound musical sounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Danielsen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: