Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Corrigendum verifies correct legends of lesion and pain intensity data in stroke rehabilitation analysis.
Uragami, S., Y. Igawa, Y. Takamura, S. Iki, S. Morioka, M. Osumi. 2026. “ Lesion and Disconnection Profiles of Pain Quality Subtypes After Stroke: Implications for Prognosis and Rehabilitation.” European Journal of Pain 30, (5): e70276. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70276. In the published article, the legends for Figure 3 and Figure 4 were incorrectly interchanged. The correct legends should read as follows: FIGURE 3 | BLDI lesion and white matter analysis results in each cluster. Lesion and white matter tract maps identified by Bayesian lesion-deficit inference (BLDI) and disconnectome analyses. Regions with Bayes Factors > 10 are shown. Each cluster's associated grey and white matter regions are overlaid on the MNI template for visualisation. BF, Bayes factor; lesions with BF10 > 10 were extracted. FIGURE 4 | Longitudinal data of pain intensity (NRS): Estimated marginal means in each cluster. Longitudinal changes in pain intensity (NRS) for each cluster over 12 weeks of exercise-based rehabilitation. The lines represent estimated marginal means from the linear mixed model; bars denote standard deviation. The trajectory of pain intensity in cluster 1 (blue line), cluster 2 (red line), cluster 3 (green line) and cluster 4 (purple line) is shown. The bar indicates the standard deviation. We apologize for this error.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: