Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reference maps threats in cloud and AI systems to existing security frameworks, indicating integration for review and audit.
This reference maps each threat in the cloud + AI threat model to four published security frameworks, so the model speaks the same language a reviewer or auditor already uses. The four frameworks, in plain terms: • OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025) — the ten highest-priority risks for systems built on a large language model. A risk-priority list. • OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications, “ASI” (2026) — the equivalent list for autonomous agents that plan, call tools, and act. It adds risks that only appear once a model can take actions on its own. • MITRE ATLAS (v5.4.0) — a catalogue of real adversary techniques against AI systems, written the way MITRE ATT&CK catalogues conventional attacks. Each technique has an identifier in the form AML.TXXXX. • NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and the Generative AI Profile (AI 600-1) — the U.S. governance structure for managing AI risk, organised around four functions: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narnaiezzsshaa Truong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: