Reveals distinct operational outcomes in multi-agent reasoning across control architectures, indicating the need for refined evaluation methods.
Three control architectures (single-shot, parallel ensemble + synthesizer, sequential four-role chain) processing one complex institutional case are shown to carry stable closure-operation signatures. Two confounds are defeated: prompts are regenerated by an independent adversarial generator and re-run in triplicate (27 outputs, 3/3 per signature); a pre-registered blind external judge classifies the nine anonymized outputs 9/9 by operation (chance p ≈ 5.1×10⁻⁵), including 6/6 on the critical pair. The key finding is the instrument inversion: the same external judge that barely discriminates the conditions under a quality rubric (Δ = 0.262) succeeds perfectly under an operation rubric — content converges across architectures, operations do not. Third deposit of the CODHZ research program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcelo Manucci (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: