Demonstrates improved scheduling efficiency in flexible manufacturing systems using robotics, implying enhanced productivity.
In flexible job shop scheduling, industrial robots undertake both workpiece transportation and loading/unloading operations. Equipping each machine with dedicated buffers tends to increase transportation workload and further intensify transport bottlenecks. Shared buffers are therefore introduced to temporarily store workpieces and relieve congestion in the production process. This paper establishes a transport-integrated flexible job shop scheduling model with shared buffer constraints, which minimizes makespan, total energy consumption, and machine load range simultaneously. Correspondingly, an enhanced non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (ENSGA-II) is developed to achieve better solution performance. A time-window-based path-planning decoding scheme is constructed to address buffer constraints and transportation conflicts in the coordinated production and transportation process. In parallel, four initialization rules are designed to improve the quality and diversity of the initial population, and a variable neighborhood search algorithm (VNS) is embedded to enhance the local exploitation ability of the proposed algorithm. The performance of the presented method is evaluated through two groups of numerical experiments. The first group is carried out on extended benchmark instances. Comparisons with the conventional Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization algorithms (MOPSO) validate the efficacy of the proposed strategies and demonstrate the superiority of ENSGA-II in both solution quality and computational efficiency. Experimental results on real-world cases further illustrate that the proposed method can effectively solve the integrated scheduling problem in flexible manufacturing systems where industrial robots are employed as the main transport resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: