Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved earthquake catalog completeness, highlighting its implications for seismological analysis.
Incomplete earthquake catalogs, especially for early aftershocks, pose challenges for accurate seismological analysis. This study introduces Auto-Biscale Empirical Transformation Application (AutoBETA), a fully automated earthquake data replenishment tool that builds upon previous semiautomated approaches by integrating grid-based density analysis with flexible missing region identification. This tool also supports user-defined polygons and hybrid strategies (union or intersection) to incorporate expert knowledge. We applied AutoBETA to one synthetic incomplete catalog and four real-earthquake catalogs: the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan, 2024 Mw 7.5 Noto, 2010 M 5.26 Baja California, and 2016 M 6.06 Norcia sequences. The analyses were conducted using magnitude thresholds of M ≥ 3.0, M ≥ 2.0, M ≥ 1.0, and M ≥ 2.0. After 100 fully automated iterations, the method replenished 43.9%, 40.0%, 40.5%, and 44.8% of the final catalogs. These results substantially improve catalog completeness, enabling more robust aftershock modeling and statistical analysis. AutoBETA is implemented in Python and is available as open-source software on GitHub.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: