Retrospective cohort study identifies baseline eosinophil count as a predictor of survival in NSCLC, suggesting its use in patient assessment.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related death globally. Immune checkpoint inhibitors improve outcomes but benefit only a subset of patients. Peripheral blood eosinophil count (PBEC) is a potential predictive biomarker, yet its role in progression-free survival (PFS) remains underexplored. This retrospective study enrolled 121 stage III/IV NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at Anqing Medical Center from 2019 to 2024. Baseline and posttreatment PBEC were analyzed with clinical variables. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test and Cox regression were used for PFS prognosis; univariate logistic regression, Akaike Information Criterion stepwise selection and nested cross-validation were applied for model exploration. Multivariate Cox regression identified baseline Log(PBEC) as an independent protective factor for PFS (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.94, P = .026), with higher PBEC linked to longer PFS. Five independent predictors were screened: sex, liver metastasis, performance status score, anti-angiogenic therapy and Log(PBEC). The exploratory model showed stable performance and clinical net benefit. Baseline PBEC is a potential and accessible predictor of PFS in NSCLC patients. A nomogram incorporating PBEC and clinical factors provides preliminary support for prognostic assessment and requires prospective validation before clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: