Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Characterizes PM2.5 variability in urban microenvironments, indicating improvements in air quality assessment.
Mobile monitoring of air pollution has been extensively employed in environmental and epidemiological studies. However, previous monitoring campaigns, which typically involved only one or two vehicles operating during temporally incomplete and imbalanced daytime, were limited in spatiotemporal coverage, resolution, and representativeness. This leaves important gaps in understanding how air pollution varies spatiotemporally across urban on-road microenvironments, as well as in assessing the impact of fleet size and temporal sampling incompleteness (daytime/weekday/weekend-skewed vs 24 h continuous and full week) on monitoring coverage and PM 2.5 estimates, respectively. Here, we fill these gaps by employing a citywide taxi-based mobile monitoring fleet of over 200 taxis operating 24 h a day over a two-week period and equipped with fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) sensors to characterize PM 2.5 spatiotemporal variability and quantify traffic-related increment contributions across diverse urban on-road microenvironments. Leveraging this large-scale, spatiotemporally dense, and representative data set, we further investigated how fleet size influences monitoring coverage and repeated visits and how temporal sampling incompleteness and imbalance affect monitoring outcomes and bias. Our results show spatial and temporal heterogeneity in on-road PM 2.5 levels and traffic-related increment contributions across microenvironments. Increasing fleet size improves spatial coverage but exhibits diminishing returns, and temporally incomplete and imbalanced sampling can introduce biased outcomes, particularly at finer temporal resolutions. These findings have important implications for refined urban air quality management and epidemiological research, thereby offering guidance and insights for future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: