Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates machine systems' impact on cultural meaning through AI summarization patterns, highlighting implications for reception studies.
The Summarizer as Horizon of Reception. This paper introduces machine-mediated reception studies: the study of how machine systems receive, transform, compress, attribute, misattribute, and redistribute cultural meaning. Its central claim is that the AI summarizer now functions as a horizon of reception (Jauss 1982): for many users, the machine-composed summary becomes the first effective encounter with a cultural object. As a founding dataset, the paper presents the AI Overview Capture Registry (EA-WG-CAPTURES-01 v7.2, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20707509), 131 documented captures of Google AI Overview, AI Mode, and knowledge-panel responses. Six recurrent patterns are identified with frequencies and classical reception analogues: morphological compression (29%), disambiguation failure (15%), compositional bystanding (6%), canonical reinflation (12%), temporal drag (2%), and epistemic hedging (16%). In one case, a minority scholarly interpretation of Sappho Fragment 31 is now presented as the default understanding. Files: EA-SEI-MMRS-DATASET-01-v1.2.pdf (232 pages, 221 embedded screenshots), full markdown, standalone article (no appendix, for LLM review), coded-patterns.json (131 pattern-coded entries), MMRS-workplan.md (journal planning document). This paper uses "reception" in a functional rather than phenomenological sense: the machine does not need to "understand" Sappho in order to alter Sappho's reception. Publication venue: Machine-Mediated Reception Studies (Preprint). machinemediation.org (forthcoming).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee Sharks (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: