Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates compression behavior in collagen hydrogels, suggesting optimal modeling approaches.
Collagen hydrogels have been used ubiquitously as engineering biomaterials with a biphasic network of fibrillar collagen and aqueous-filled voids that contribute to a complex, compressible, and nonlinear mechanical behavior - not well captured within the infinitesimal strain theory. In this study, type-I collagen, processed from a bovine corium, was fabricated into disks at 2, 3, and 4% (w/w) and exposed to 0, 105, 106, and 107 microjoules of ultraviolet light or enzymatic degradation via matrix metalloproteinase-2. Fully hydrated gels were subjected to unconfined, aqueous, compression testing with experimental data modeled within a continuum mechanics framework by employing the uncommon Blatz–Ko material model for porous elastic materials and a nonlinear form of the Poisson's ratio. From the Generalized form, the Special Blatz–Ko, compressible Neo–Hookean, and incompressible Mooney–Rivlin models were derived and the best-fit material parameters reported for each. The average root-mean-squared (RMS) error for the General (RMS = 0.13 ± 0.07) and Special Blatz–Ko (RMS = 0.13 ± 0.07) were lower than the Neo–Hookean (RMS = 0.23 ± 0.10) and Mooney–Rivlin (RMS = 0.18 ± 0.08) models. We conclude that, with a single fitted-parameter, the Special Blatz–Ko sufficiently captured the salient features of collagen hydrogel compression over most examined formulations and treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lane et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: