Women with acute coronary syndrome and myocardial infarction experience more comorbidities, atypical symptoms, treatment delays, and worse outcomes compared to men.
What are the differences in presentation, treatment, and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes between women and men?
Women with acute coronary syndromes face significant disparities in presentation, treatment delays, and clinical outcomes compared to men, highlighting the need for tailored educational and management strategies.
In the USA and internationally, women experience farranging differences with respect to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and myocardial infarction (MI). Women suffer from more comorbidities than men, such as smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and poor mental health. They some-times exhibit atypical MI presentation symptoms and are overall less likely to present with chest pain. Women are more likely than men to encounter delays between the onset of symptoms and arrival at the hospital or to guideline treatment. The use of various surgical and pharmacological treatments, including revascularization approaches, also differs. Women, on average, have worse outcomes than men following MI, with more complications, higher mortality rates, and poorer recovery. Internationally, outcomes are similar despite various differences in health care and culture in non-US countries. In this review, we detail differences regarding ACS and MI in women, describing their complex correlations and discussing their possible causes. Educational approaches that are tailored to women might help to reduce the incidence of ACS and MI, as well as outcomes following hospitalization. Although outcomes following acute MI have been improving over the years, women may require special consideration in order to see continued improvement.
Garth Graham (Fri,) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and myocardial infarction (MI). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated. Women with acute coronary syndrome and myocardial infarction experience more comorbidities, atypical symptoms, treatment delays, and worse outcomes compared to men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: