The transition from algorithmic to memory-based performance is a core component of cognitive skill learning. There has been debate about the temporal dynamics of strategy execution, with some models assuming a race (i.e., independent, capacity unconstrained parallel processing) between algorithm and retrieval, and others assuming a choice mechanism. The authors investigated this issue using a new approach that allows the latency of each algorithm step to be measured, in turn providing new insight into (a) whether there is slowing of 1 or more algorithm steps on trials immediately preceding the 1st retrieval trial for an item, as might be expected if there is a competitive strategy execution process of some type other than a race, and (b) whether there is partial algorithm completion on retrieval trials, as would be expected if the 2 strategies are executed in parallel. Results are uniquely consistent with a strategy choice mechanism involving a competition between the retrieval strategy and the 1st step of the algorithm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajic et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: