Key result
Integrated CTA and perfusion accurately detects flow-limiting CAD with an AUC of ~0.87.
Why the study?
Does integrated CTA-CTP accurately identify flow-limiting CAD compared to ICA and SPECT/MPI in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Cross-Sectional (n=381)
Blinded independent core laboratories
Yes
Does integrated CTA-CTP accurately identify flow-limiting CAD compared to ICA and SPECT/MPI in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.91)
The integration of CTA and CTP provides high diagnostic accuracy for identifying flow-limiting coronary artery disease, significantly improving upon CTA alone.
AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic power of integrating the results of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) to identify coronary artery disease (CAD) defined as a flow limiting coronary artery stenosis causing a perfusion defect by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a multicentre study to evaluate the accuracy of integrated CTA-CTP for the identification of patients with flow-limiting CAD defined by ≥50% stenosis by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with a corresponding perfusion deficit on stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/MPI). Sixteen centres enroled 381 patients who underwent combined CTA-CTP and SPECT/MPI prior to conventional coronary angiography. All four image modalities were analysed in blinded independent core laboratories. The prevalence of obstructive CAD defined by combined ICA-SPECT/MPI and ICA alone was 38 and 59%, respectively. The patient-based diagnostic accuracy defined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of integrated CTA-CTP for detecting or excluding flow-limiting CAD was 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-0.91]. In patients without prior myocardial infarction, the AUC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and in patients without prior CAD the AUC for combined CTA-CTP was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.97). For the combination of a CTA stenosis ≥50% stenosis and a CTP perfusion deficit, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predicative values (95% CI) were 80% (72-86), 74% (68-80), 65% (58-72), and 86% (80-90), respectively. For flow-limiting disease defined by ICA-SPECT/MPI, the accuracy of CTA was significantly increased by the addition of CTP at both the patient and vessel levels. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CTA and perfusion correctly identifies patients with flow limiting CAD defined as ≥50 stenosis by ICA causing a perfusion defect by SPECT/MPI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rochitte et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=381). Integrated computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) vs. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with stress SPECT/MPI was evaluated on Patient-based diagnostic accuracy (AUC) for detecting or excluding flow-limiting CAD (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.91). Integrated computed tomography angiography and perfusion accurately identified patients with flow-limiting coronary artery disease with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.91).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: