Argument challenges the adequacy of absolutely intrinsic properties in necessitating phenomenal properties.
According to Russellian monism, there are non-structural properties that both underlie physical, structural properties and help constitute, and thus necessitate, phenomenal properties (Alter and Pereboom Citation2023). Derk Pereboom (Citation2011, Citation2014, Citation2015, Citation2019) characterizes the relevant non-structural properties as absolutely intrinsic properties, where ‘P is an absolutely intrinsic property of X just in case P is an intrinsic property of X and P is not grounded in extrinsic properties of either X or parts of X’ (Pereboom Citation2019: 184). Justin Mendelow (Citation2024) argues that Pereboom’s characterization is inadequate because it implies that non-structural properties do not necessitate phenomenal properties, either alone or in combination with structural properties. We argue that Mendelow’s argument rests on premises that Pereboom can reasonably reject.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: