Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study finds no increased risk of osteonecrosis in women treated with romosozumab compared to PTH analogs, suggesting safety in short-term use.
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare but clinically important adverse event in antiresorptive osteoporosis care. The most recently approved osteoporosis medication, romosozumab, has a dual mechanism, combining antiresorptive and osteoanabolic effects. Thus, concern exists regarding a possible risk for MRONJ with romosozumab, although current evidence is limited mainly to isolated case reports. We performed a retrospective new-user active comparator propensity score-matched cohort study in the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network comparing women treated with romosozumab vs. parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs (teriparatide or abaloparatide). Women aged ≥ 18 years with no prior osteonecrosis, jaw inflammatory disease, oral/head-neck cancer, or radiation exposure and no recent exposure to chemotherapy were eligible. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 15,689 patients remained in each cohort. During 1 year of follow-up, MRONJ occurred in 11 romosozumab-treated patients and 12 PTH analog-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.39-2.01; log-rank p = 0.78). Absolute event rates were very low in both groups (0.070% vs. 0.076%). As expected, the positive control outcome of hypercalcemia occurred less often with romosozumab (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58-0.75). These real-world data do not indicate a detectable excess short-term MRONJ risk with romosozumab compared with PTH analogs over the approved treatment window, although modest differences cannot be excluded because events were rare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stokar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: