Pilot randomized trial evaluates pain control in cancer patients using paracetamol versus placebo, suggesting need for improved recruitment strategies.
Objectives Clinical guidelines, including the WHO analgesic ladder, advocate paracetamol in conjunction with strong opioids for moderate to severe cancer pain despite a lack of evidence for its efficacy in this setting. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a larger randomised controlled trial (RCT) with the aim of establishing whether paracetamol combined with strong opioids provides superior analgesia for cancer-related pain over strong opioids alone. Methods Adult patients with incurable cancer taking regular paracetamol and strong opioids with an average pain score 2–8 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0–10) in the past 24 hours were randomised to receive either paracetamol or placebo for 13 days, with assessments at day 7 and 14. Outcomes were recruitment, retention, appropriateness of study design, patient acceptability and early signals of pain outcome. Results Thirty-four participants were recruited and 28 randomised at 12 months. After 7 months, the intervention phase was reduced to 7 days to improve recruitment and mitigate attrition. Retention was high but the clinical team assessed 7 days in the study as adequate and less burdensome for the patients. Average pain (NRS) on day 7 (change from baseline) was similar in the placebo group (−0.27) versus the paracetamol group (−0.46). Groups difference: −0.19, 95% CI −1.1 to 0.7, ( p =0.67). Patient recruitment was slow. Due to this, the study did not progress to a definitive RCT. Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates feasibility of the withdrawal design but signalled the need for a different recruitment strategy and a shorter study. Notably, there were no adverse pain outcomes, as NRS scores and opioid requirements didn’t increase. Trial registration number NCT02706769 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hagen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: