In Defense of Descriptive Geometry and Building Drawing

This paper examines the basic, fundamental subjects for a civil engineer and architect: descriptive geometry and architectural and construction drawing. It shows why descriptive geometry is so necessary for an engineer. Two examples are given, taken on the basis of an elementary surface drawing, without involving the main surface drawing, which is especially difficult for students to perceive, although the solution to the problem turns out to be quite simple from the point of view of both a teacher and an educated student with spatial perception. Next, it shows by examples why architectural and construction drawing is necessary for architects, showing elements of drawings that do not meet the rules of modern GOST at all: drawing on a piece of paper at random and without complying with working standards - such images are not a construction document subject to mandatory execution. Even the main inscription with the signatures of all those involved in the project is missing there – even on the graphic sheets of graduation papers such inscriptions are missing, along with the signatures of both graduates and their supervisors. Well, the signature of the normocontroller at the Department of Architecture of the MGAKHI named after V.I. Surikov has never been heard of. Therefore, all graphic works performed by students have never been drawings of course projects in the form that should be applied specifically to the design graphic material, at most it is a demonstration material, but not the project sheets. At the end of the article, the words of Professor A.I. Dobryakov are quoted, whose textbook on descriptive geometry is considered a classic for the architectural field of study, and his words about the negative impact of narrow practicality and industry, into which heads of departments, deans and even universities fall, are relevant to this day.