Essay critiques net-zero's role in climate governance, highlighting its violent implications for ecosystems and communities.
This Speaking Out essay critically interrogates the hegemony of net-zero as the dominant framework guiding climate and environmental governance. We argue that net-zero is not a neutral technical climate mitigation target but a world-making practice that restructures ecological relations through calculative, managerial, and market logics. Drawing on political ontology and pluriversal thinking, we conceptualise net-zero as enacting interconnected forms of economic, material, temporal, and epistemic violence that displace responsibility, legitimise extractivism, and marginalise alternative lifeworlds. As net-zero increasingly shapes how sustainability is organised – also extending into biodiversity and conservation domains – we call on organisation and management scholars to scrutinise its assumptions and engage more deeply with its political and ontological consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acosta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: