PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 19, 2026The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety1 citationsOpen Access

A framework to characterize the costs of delayed diagnoses

View Full Paper
CBCarl T. BerdahlJHJoachim M. HeroSMSara G. McCleskey

Key Points

  • This research aims to create a framework that characterizes the various costs associated with delayed diagnoses.
  • Used a three-phase process: preparatory phase with an expert advisory group, qualitative information gathering, and refinement with stakeholder input.
  • Engaged multiple perspectives to inform the initial framework.
  • Tested framework against clinical scenarios for relevance and accuracy.
  • The framework outlines five domains of costs: direct, indirect, opportunity, long-term disability, and intangible costs.
  • Identified challenges in cost measurement, including variability across insurance types, and lack of usable data sources.
  • Highlighted the significance of intangible costs, which, although important, are difficult to quantify.

Abstract

Background Delays in diagnosis are emotionally and financially impactful for patients and families, the healthcare system, and society, yet the true costs of delayed diagnoses have been inadequately characterized. We sought to establish a framework characterizing the costs of delayed diagnoses that could be used by diverse stakeholders. Methods We used a three-phase process: 1) a preparatory phase deploying an expert advisory group to establish conditions of interest; 2) a qualitative information gathering phase to ensure multiple perspectives informed the initial framework; and 3) a refinement phase to integrate stakeholder input and test the framework against clinical scenarios. Results Our multi-level framework delineates five domains of costs attributable to delayed diagnoses: direct, indirect, opportunity, long-term disability, and intangible costs. Challenges in cost measurement include: varying costs across insurance type and healthcare systems; determination of whether and how long a diagnosis is delayed; a paucity of usable data sources; and considerations that affect cost and cost interpretation on a case-by-case basis, including conditions that resolve without diagnosis or treatment. Intangible costs are important to patients but pose challenges for measurement. Discussion Our framework allows users to identify, organize, and estimate the total costs of delayed diagnoses through a comprehensive accounting of costs that are often overlooked in analyses of diagnostic delays. It allows for estimations of costs depending on the user’s goals and data availability, reinforcing its flexibility across users and uses. Future work is needed to develop usable data sources to characterize costs attributable to diagnostic delays.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berdahl et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a34de1265a5b0777af2d91fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2026.06.005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper