Evaluates safety of low-dose methylphenidate ER in schizophrenia, suggesting it may not exacerbate symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia significantly impair functional outcomes, yet no approved pharmacological treatments exist. Low-dose psychostimulants, such as methylphenidate extended-release (ER), have shown preliminary promise for cognitive enhancement but raise concerns about psychosis exacerbation. This study evaluates the safety of low-dose methylphenidate ER in clinically stable schizophrenia patients. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, fixed-dose crossover trial (NCT05414058) was conducted at the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre from September 2022 to October 2024, enrolling 24 participants with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Participants received 4 weeks of methylphenidate ER (18 mg for wk 1, 36 mg for wk 2 to 4) and 4 weeks of treatment-as-usual in a crossover design, with a follow-up at week 12. RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred, and there was no evidence of psychotic symptom exacerbation. PANSS-6 scores showed no worsening attributable to treatment; detailed efficacy results are reported elsewhere. Vital signs showed minimal, nonsignificant changes: mean weight decreased by 2.28 lbs ( P >0.05), heart rate increased by 3.67 bpm ( P >0.05), and systolic blood pressure rose by 3.6 mmHg ( P >0.05). The CADDRA checklist indicated significant appetite reduction ( P <0.001), reduced fatigue ( P =0.002), and decreased sadness ( P <0.001) during treatment, with effects resolving post-treatment. One participant reported transient passive suicidal ideation, resolving without intervention. Eleven participants withdrew, primarily due to subjective side effects within the first 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose methylphenidate ER appears safe in stable schizophrenia patients on antipsychotics, with no significant psychosis exacerbation and minimal physiological changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: