Randomized trial examines propolis gel's impact on herpetic gingivostomatitis in children, highlighting promising results.
This pilot trial was designed to investigate the efficacy of propolis-based gel in the treatment of primary herpetic gingivostomatitis in children and assessed salivary IFN-γ levels before and after treatment to reflect the anti-inflammatory action of propolis, as IFN-γ is one of the principle cytokines involved in the disease pathogenesis. A total of 60 patients were randomized using a computer-generated sequence and allocated into the two study groups: intervention group treated with 5% propolis gel and placebo group treated with placebo mucoadhesive gel. Both were applied on the oral lesion two to three times daily for 1 week. At follow-up visit after 7 days, the following parameters were measured; severity of clinical lesions, pain assessment using visual analog scale, salivary IFN-γ levels using ELISA, as well as eating and drinking ability. Results revealed a statistically significant difference in pain scores, clinical severity scores, and the ability to eat and drink between the propolis and placebo groups on the 7th day of treatment (p ≤ 0.001, each). Furthermore, values for salivary IFN-γ showed statistically significant differences between the propolis and placebo groups on the 7th day of treatment (p ≤ 0.001). Moreover, in the propolis group, there were statistically significant differences in all clinical parameters, including pain scores, clinical severity scores, and the ability to eat and drink, as well as IFN-γ levels before and after treatment (p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.001, 0.014, and p ≤ 0.001, respectively). In the placebo group, although there was a statistically significant reduction in pain scores, the ability to eat and drink, and salivary IFN-γ level before and after treatment (p ≤0.001 and p = 0.033 and 0.013, respectively), but there was no statistically significant difference in scores of clinical severities before and after treatment (p = 0.099). Propolis showed promising therapeutic effects that could avoid the mishaps of the currently used medications for the management of primary herpetic gingivostomatitis in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shalaby et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: