Comprehensive genetic analysis reveals CAD-like signatures in lymphoma-like cases, indicating classification revisions may be necessary.
Background The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification defines cold agglutinin disease (CAD) as a clonal B‐cell lymphoproliferative disorder occurring in the absence of overt lymphoma, whereas cases associated with lymphoma are classified as cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS). However, whether this distinction fully reflects the biological spectrum of cold agglutinin–associated disorders remains uncertain. Methods We performed a comprehensive pathological review, immunoglobulin gene analysis and whole‐exome sequencing in eight patients with clinically well‐characterised CAD or CAS. Results Five cases showed pathological findings typical of CAD, whereas two cases demonstrated lymphoma‐like bone marrow infiltrates resembling lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL). Nevertheless, no CD5‐positive or CD10‐positive clonal B‐cell population suggestive of a specific lymphoma subtype was identified by flow cytometry. Six patients showed highly restricted IGHV4‐34 usage, and mutations involving KMT2D and CARD11 were identified. No pathogenic MYD88 L265P or CXCR4 mutations were detected in any case. Notably, the two morphologically LPL‐like cases lacked the canonical genetic hallmarks of LPL and instead exhibited immunogenetic and mutational features characteristic of CAD. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that CAD‐like genetic signatures can be present even in cases with lymphoma‐like morphology that would currently be classified as CAS under the WHO criteria. Our results highlight a clinically relevant genotype–phenotype discordance and support the integration of molecular hallmarks into diagnostic algorithms to better reflect the biological spectrum of cold agglutinin–associated disorders. Trial Registration : The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: