Reformulates set theory and number systems in a new framework, suggesting improved foundational concepts.
Classical Cantor-ZFC set theory acts as the ultimate bedrock of essentialist mathematics, assuming that elements possess an inherent, independent existence (Svabhāva) and restricting the membership relation (∈) to flat, two-dimensional Boolean valuations. This paper presents a complete topological and algebraic reformulation of both set theory and thefoundational number system, establishing Reflexive Set Theory (RST) and its corresponding Reflexive Topos (RST). By redefining elements, belonging (∈∗), and inclusion (⊆∗) as dynamical projections over a non-Abelian Heyting sheaf Ω∗, we eliminate the pathological settheoretic singularities (e.g., Vitali non-measurable sets) that plague classical analysis. Underthis framework, we construct the holistic number system N∗ using a modified set of Peanoaxioms, where every number is represented as a dual-axis pair n = (A,B)—representing comoving objective manifestation and subjective orientation. We prove the Reflexive ClosureTheorem, demonstrating that the subobject classifier Ω∗ is recursively closed as an internalized object within RST, thus providing a pristine, non-regressive foundation for both settheory and the reflexive logic proposed in Paper 0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hongri Liu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: