Review evaluates therapeutic mechanisms and delivery systems of plant-derived peptides in dermatological applications, highlighting barriers to clinical use.
Cutaneous infections and chronic inflammatory wounds remain difficult to treat because antimicrobial resistance, polymicrobial biofilms, excessive protease activity, oxidative stress, and impaired barrier repair collectively reduce the effectiveness of conventional topical therapies. Plant-derived antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and peptide-associated bioactives offer antimicrobial, antibiofilm, immunomodulatory, and tissue reparative potential; however, their clinical translation is limited by proteolytic instability, poor stratum corneum penetration, short cutaneous residence time, formulation variability, cytotoxicity risks and limited human evidence. The key research gap is the lack of an integrated translational framework linking plant-derived peptide bioactivity with polymer engineering, advanced delivery systems, skin microenvironment biology, manufacturability, and regulatory feasibility. This review aims to critically evaluate the design principles, therapeutic mechanisms, delivery platforms, and translational barriers of plant-based peptide–polymer therapeutics for cutaneous infection and inflammation. We summarize major classes of plant-derived antimicrobial peptides, including defensins, cyclotides, thionins, hevein-like peptides, snakins, lipid transfer proteins, and knottin-type scaffolds, and examine engineering strategies such as self-assembly, aromatic N-capping, PEGylation, lipidation, dendritic architectures, and stimuli-responsive conjugation. We further discuss topical matrices, nanocarriers, liposomes, electrospun fibers, and surface-tethered biomaterials as delivery platforms for improving peptide stability, local retention, and controlled release. Finally, we identify key translational bottlenecks, including selectivity, toxicity, scalability, batch reproducibility, regulatory classification, and insufficient clinical validation. Mechanism-driven peptide optimization, quality-by-design manufacturing, standardized preclinical models, and controlled clinical trials will be essential for advancing these systems toward safe and effective dermatological therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: