Analyzes critical flow rate in capillary channels, indicating key control factors.
Capillary channel flow (CCF) is important in microgravity and microscale open-channel systems, where operation is limited by a critical flow rate above which the free surface collapses and gas is ingested, causing choking. Although one-dimensional models and three-dimensional computations can determine this limit numerically, a compact explicit scaling expression for different geometries remains desirable. In this work, steady CCF is analyzed using a balance among capillary pressure, convective acceleration, and viscous pressure loss. The resulting formulation predicts the critical flow rate from the critical velocity scale and channel cross-sectional area. Comparison with International Space Station experimental data shows that the model captures the measured length dependence for parallel-plate (PP), groove (GR), and wedge (WE) channels. The fitted coefficient is s=0.71 for both the PP and groove channels and s=0.45 for the wedge channel, indicating that neglected geometric and numerical factors remain of order unity. A parametric analysis based on the Ohnesorge number and visco-geometric parameter quantifies the transition between convection-dominated and viscous-loss-dominated regimes. In the convection-dominated and viscous-loss-dominated limits, the dimensionless critical velocity approaches V=s(1+2/Ω)1/2 and V=2s/(Kfl̃), respectively. These asymptotic expressions clarify how inertia, viscous loss, channel length, and free-surface curvature control choking onset. The fitted coefficient is further interpreted using a cross section-based Weber number as an a posteriori measure of the inertial–capillary balance. Once calibrated by one representative experiment or high-fidelity computation, the scaling analysis can estimate critical flow rate trends for geometrically similar open capillary channels under comparable boundary conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: