Demonstrates reduced high-risk dietary errors in inpatient rehabilitation, suggesting effective interventions.
BACKGROUND: Wrong meal tray deliveries in hospital settings pose a significant threat to patient safety, particularly for individuals with dietary restrictions due to dysphagia, allergies, or feeding assistance needs. OBJECTIVE: To implement a multipronged quality improvement intervention aimed at reducing wrong meal tray deliveries and associated high-risk dietary errors in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. METHODS: A pre-postintervention study was conducted using data from an internal event reporting system from May 2023 to February 2025. Interventions included wristband scanning, dietary-nursing handoff forms for 1:1 feeds, dedicated meal carts, communication protocols, and nursing education on the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) diet levels. Errors were classified by clinical severity and type: high-risk errors (including allergen exposures or incorrect textures), wrong-patient or wrong-tray errors (without immediate clinical harm), and administrative/documentation errors. RESULTS: When normalized to patient-days, the overall meal tray error rate declined significantly postintervention (1.83 versus 0.65 errors per 1000 patient-days; P=0.025). High-risk errors (those involving allergen exposure or aspiration risk) declined by over 80%, representing the most clinically meaningful improvement observed. CONCLUSIONS: A targeted, systems-based intervention can significantly reduce high-risk dietary errors in the inpatient setting. Sustained success will require continued compliance auditing, feedback loops, and ongoing education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grigoropoulos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: