This framework evaluates robot-friendly built environments, indicating a need for scalable design standards in facilities.
Autonomous robotic systems are being deployed in commercial, healthcare, logistics, and mixed-use built environments at a rate that significantly outpaces the adaptive capacity of existing building design and management paradigms. Buildings have historically been conceived exclusively for human occupants, and the resulting absence of a structured, scalable framework for evaluating or designing robot-ready facilities constitutes a critical gap in both research and professional practice. This article introduces the Robot-Friendly Buildings Level of Service (RFB-LOS) framework: a five-tier hierarchical classification system that characterises the degree to which a built environment supports autonomous robotic operations across six evaluative dimensions—building intelligence, active infrastructure, architectural planning, accessibility, observability, and safety. The framework spans a continuum from Robot Excluded (RFB-LOS-1), in which a building has no awareness of its robotic occupants, to Physical AI Robot Optimised (RFB-LOS-5), in which a Physical AI middleware layer assumes the highest command authority within a coordinated human–robot–building ecosystem. Drawing structural inspiration from the SAE J3016 Levels of Driving Automation, the EU Smart Readiness Indicator, HIMSS EMRAM, and BREEAM/LEED sustainability certification, the RFB-LOS framework is positioned as a foundational standard for the built environment and systems engineering community. Five real-world case studies spanning retail, hospitality, healthcare, and corporate sectors across four countries validate the framework’s tier assignments against observed operational outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: