First-in-human trial evaluates NTSR1-targeted imaging in prostate cancer, showing differential outcomes post-ADT.
Background Neurotensin receptor-1 (NTSR1) is a promising target for prostate cancer imaging. This study evaluates the first-in-human NTSR1-directed radiotracer [18F]-AlF-NOTA-neurotensin and compares it with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617.Methods In a single-centre, prospective study, 23 men with biopsy-verified prostate cancer were enrolled at Xiangya Hospital (June 2020–June 2024). Within 7 days before radical prostatectomy, whole-body PET/CT was performed after sequential administration of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [18F]-AlF-NOTA-neurotensin. Imaging metrics were assessed against histopathology. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PSMA and NTSR1 was conducted to correlate tracer uptake with receptor expression.Results The median age was 71 years (IQR 66–75); 14 were treatment-naïve and 9 had prior androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). In untreated patients, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 showed superior sensitivity (92.9%), specificity (100%), PPV (100%), and NPV (93.3%) compared to [18F]-AlF-NOTA-neurotensin . At the lesion level, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 localized 36 of 38 foci (94.7%), while [18F]-AlF-NOTA-neurotensin identified none (0%; p < 0.05). After short-term ADT, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 sensitivity dropped to 33.3%, while [18F]-AlF-NOTA-neurotensin sensitivity rose to 77.8% (p < 0.05). Lesion-based detection rates were 36% and 64%, respectively, and there were no significant differences in specificity, PPV, or NPV. IHC revealed a significant decrease in PSMA H-score from 9 (IQR 6.5–12) to 7 (IQR 1.3–8.8; p = 0.034) and an increase in NTSR1 H-score from 1 (IQR 0.25–2) to 6 (IQR 3–8; p = 0.003).Conclusion [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 remains the gold standard for treatment-naïve prostate cancer, whereas [18F]-AlF-NOTA-neurotensin provides complementary-diagnostic value by enhancing lesion detection after ADT. Our findings support a stage-adapted, receptor-driven imaging strategy that addresses tumor phenotypic heterogeneity, enabling more precise management throughout the disease course.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: