Key result
Higher AS5F score is linked to ~7% higher odds of post-stroke AF detection per point.
Why the study?
The performance of the AS5F score in real-world populations remained incompletely characterized, and whether left atrial dilatation improves risk prediction was unknown.
Does the AS5F score accurately predict the detection of post-stroke atrial fibrillation in a real-world cohort, and does left atrial dilatation improve prediction?
Cohort (n=410)
No
Does the AS5F score accurately predict the detection of post-stroke atrial fibrillation in a real-world cohort, and does left atrial dilatation improve prediction?
Odds Ratio: 1.07 (95% CI 1.03–1.11)
p-value: p=<0.001
The AS5F risk score offers only moderate discrimination for detecting AF post-stroke, largely driven by age, suggesting a simplified clinical model combining age and left atrial dilatation may be equally effective.
AS5F score shows modest post-stroke AF discrimination similar to age alone; leaves open whether simplified age plus left atrial dilatation models suffice.
Background: Prolonged cardiac monitoring increases atrial fibrillation (AF) detection after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The AS5F score was developed to identify patients at higher risk of post-stroke AF, but its performance in real-world populations remains incompletely characterized. We aimed to externally validate the AS5F score and to evaluate whether left atrial dilatation (LAD) improves risk prediction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 410 patients with ischemic stroke or TIA who underwent prolonged Holter monitoring between 2021 and 2025. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to assess discrimination. Model calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Results: AF was detected in 33 patients (8.0%). The AS5F score was significantly associated with AF detection (OR 1.07 per point; 95% CI 1.03–1.11; p < 0.001), showing modest discrimination (AUC 0.69). Age alone demonstrated similar performance (AUC 0.69). LAD was strongly associated with AF (OR 4.00; 95% CI 1.79–8.93; p = 0.001) but had lower discriminatory ability (AUC 0.61). In patients with available echocardiographic data (n = 369), a combined age + LAD model achieved an AUC of 0.73 with adequate calibration. The improvement compared with AS5F was not statistically significant. Conclusions: In this external real-world cohort, AS5F demonstrated moderate discrimination for post-stroke AF detection. A simplified model combining age and left atrial dilatation showed numerically higher performance and may represent a pragmatic strategy for risk stratification in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ischemic stroke or TIA (n=410). AS5F score was evaluated on Detection of atrial fibrillation during prolonged Holter monitoring (OR 1.07 per point, 95% CI 1.03-1.11, p=<0.001). The AS5F score was significantly associated with post-stroke atrial fibrillation detection (OR 1.07 per point) but demonstrated modest discrimination (AUC 0.69) similar to age alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: